It's very suspicious that the "Buy America" Condition is not receiving wider attention in US media outlets. Perhaps Daschle's brouhaha was really smart political strategy to steal the spotlight from a really bad policy proposal that would probably be very popular with the median voter.
- ► 2013 (95)
- ► 2012 (129)
- ► 2011 (365)
- ► 2010 (478)
- The 'Asian Model' Is No Alternative
- The State of Things
- Buddy, 1996-2009
- Ah, it was the Gaussian Copula Function!
- Obama's Gamble
- Monetary Policy as Counter-Insurgency Strategy
- Mixed Signals
- Deflation Watch
- America's Lost Decade
- The Great-ish Depression
- Slow Start
- Nobelist Smackdown Watch
- Word of the Day
- Obama Goes Abroad
- Regulation Blues
- Japan Tumbles
- Macroeconomics: Dismal Once Again
- Weird Science
- You Know You Are in Trouble When...
- The Obama Tightrope
- The Largest Earmark in History
- Sino-American Fist-Clenching
- The Politics of Insourcing
- A Word Of Caution - Microfinance and the Global Fi...
- Microsavings: The New Microcredit?
- Chaque Nation pour Elle-même
- Nudge, Nudge, Wink, Wink, Say No More
- What We Can Learn from Chile
- What Is This 'Politics' Of Which You Speak?
- What You Don't Know Can't Hurt You, But What You D...
- The World Economies, Explained by Two Cows
- The Decider
- "Channel Fog Thickens; Continent Cut Off."
- Playing Both Sides
- The Next Big Resource?
- Good Reads for a Chilly Afternoon
- Congress's Bad Trade Policy
- The Depression in Song
- ▼ February (38)
- ► 2008 (134)
- ► 2007 (142)
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Posted by Sarah Bauerle Danzman at 10:36 AM . Wednesday, February 4, 2009
The EU, however, wasted no time decrying a return to Smoot-Hawley era protectionism. Sending a letter to the US Congress, EU Ambassador John Bruton warned of trade wars, WTO dispute settlement court, and further protectionist spiraling. Bruton, as well as Democratic and Republican leadership in the Senate called upon the moral authority of the US to resist the urge towards insularity. President Obama came out today strongly against the condition, but it seems he may have difficulty reigning in Congress. (see here too)
Quickly, the problem with protectionism is that it tends to spiral - when one country initiates protective measures, other countries retaliate. This pushes down trade, which is income-depriving on the aggregate level. The political challenge to combating protectionism is that gains and losses for trade are unevenly distributed. In the case of the "Buy America" clause, the United Steel Workers Union is lobbying to protect its interests. The Steel lobby tends to hold a lot of sway since Congressional seats in many mid-west states are heavily influenced by the Union's endorsements and disparagements. However, protection for one industry means losses to others, especially exporters. That's why we see Caterpillar, GE, and other major exporters coming out against the provision.
It was really a matter of time until grandstanding on the stimulus turned from arguments over fiscal responsibility to arguments over protectionism. What's scary is the wide-spread support for myopic policies that favor one industry over an entire economy. What's relieving is Obama's turn from populist protectionist rhetoric to clear-minded understanding of the dangers of such a policy.