The Economist has a nice article on the variance in politicians' professions across countries. The U.S., unsurprisingly, has more lawyers than any other country, and a remarkable lack of diplomats, civil service professionals, economists, and academics. And is it surprising that the Chinese government boasts of so many engineers (among them, President Hu Jintao)? Or that the military is so well represented in S. Korea but not India?
What would a model of the political economy of the professions of national leaders look like? Is it a function of national history or present circumstance? Does the composition of the leadership speak to ideational national values, or materialistic desires? How does this composition change over time? How does one's profession affect levels of partisanship?
I wonder how this picture would look with a larger sample of countries and the inclusion of religious leaders.
(ht: Blattman)
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(521)
-
▼
April
(22)
- The Pros of Counter-Cyclicality
- Obama on Economic Policy
- Who's Your Boss?
- Obama Does No Harm
- The Academy Strikes Back
- Mexico gets $47b IMF Credit Line
- Trillion Dollar Graffiti
- Links and Asides and more Game Theory
- Game Theory and Piracy
- Map of Pirate Attacks in 2009...
- Listmania
- Who Thinks Game Theory Isn't Realistic?
- The Benefits of Migration
- Champions
- Round and Round We Go
- Should Regulation Be Countercyclical?
- N! C! U!
- An Open Letter to Economists
- Bono vs. Bill
- Naming and Shaming
- Who Adjusts? A Continuing Series
- Radio Free-Riding Europe
-
▼
April
(22)
Monday, April 27, 2009
Who's Your Boss?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment