We have been hard at work striving to apply some network concepts to the international financial system. Among other things, we managed to figure out (and by we I really mean Will) how to use R to visualize weighted network data. The two pictures here, which depict cross-border equity assets (stock) in 1980 and 2001, is one result of this effort. The 18 countries account for about 80 percent of global financial transactions (exclusive of government/central bank official reserve transactions). The thickness of the red and black reflect the absolute value of the assets placed by country A in country B. We need to add arrows here to make the direction clearer. Suffice it to say that the thick black lines linking to the US represent equity assets placed in the US market. Red lines emanating from the US represent US equity assets in the foreign market. Notice that these ties are substantially thicker in 2001 than they are in 1980, indicating the growth of cross-border equity investment since 1980.
- ► 2012 (129)
- ► 2011 (365)
- Tyler Cowen on Immigration
- Why Greece Won't Default (Yet)
- Mea Culpa (Kinda Sorta)
- Much Ado About China
- Structure and Experimentation in the International...
- Nye Does TED
- The Global Financial System as a Network
- Fiscal Stimulus and The Unholy Trilemma
- The EU as a Deficit Economy
- Balancing Act
- Global Imbalances
- TARP Still Making Money
- Aid Incentives Matter (?)
- Aniversario Feliz
- We're About to Get a Huge Natural Experiment of Au...
- China's Tantrum
- Hegemony and Currency Wars
- If the Debt Cannot Be Sustained, It Won't Be
- Rosling Talks to TED (Again)
- Trivia Time (E.U. Currency Arbitrage Edition)
- Pounding Away at the Deregulation Zombie
- Policy Preferences over Capital Controls
- Just How Laissez-Faire Was the Financial Sector?
- Good Research = ...
- The Merits and Demerits of Relative Decline
- William Easterly Is Shrill!
- Perspective Matters
- Lou Dobbs: Hypocrite
- Auschwitz, Germany, and 1968
- Hatchet Job
- OT: European Stuff
- Defining Basel Down
- A Prediction Sure to Be Wrong
- Revisionist History
- Switzerland Says Basel Isn't Enough
- The New Germany, 20 Years On
- The EU (Finally!) Cedes Some IMF Seats to the BRIC...
- Politics Everywhere or Markets in Everything? Fake...
- This Week in "The World Is Messy"
- ▼ October (41)
- ► 2009 (521)
- ► 2008 (134)
- ► 2007 (142)
Monday, October 25, 2010
Posted by Thomas Oatley at 8:44 PM . Monday, October 25, 2010
Node size reflects the relative importance of that market in the global financial system. I was not surprised by the stability of the US position between 1980 and 2001; I was surprised by the dramatic change in the UK position. We are working to determine when, exactly, this huge growth in the importance of the London market occurred. Post 1987 I would guess. I am a bit surprised at how little change there is otherwise. In a period that we think of as financial globalization and redistribution of economic power, these figures suggest that more capital flowed across borders, but it went basically to the same place in 2001 that it went in 1980--to the US.
More of this to come in the future.
I should note that we generated these figures using the tnet R package developed by Tore Opsahl. Thank you, Tore, for making this available. The underlying data come from Kubelec, Chris and Sa, Filipa G., The Geographical Composition of National External Balance Sheets: 1980-2005 (March 23, 2010). Bank of England Working Paper No. 384. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1577143.