Proponents often recommend high labor standards as a means of reducing inequality between and within countries. Opponents suggest that labor standards exacerbate international and domestic inequalities. In this paper, we forward a simple argument whereby the impact of higher labor standards on domestic inequality depends on a country's labor endowment. We hypothesize that where labor is abundant, higher standards will exacerbate inequality. Where labor is scarce, higher labor standards might lower inequality. In both cases, the impact of labor standards on inequality work through an employment and wage effect. Using newly available data on labor standards around the world from 1981 to 2000, we provide evidence largely consistent with our hypotheses. Higher labor standards do, indeed, exacerbate inequality in labor-abundant economies. On the other hand, higher labor standards lower inequality in labor-scarce economies. We discuss the implications of these findings for work on labor market insiders and outsiders as well as the political economy of development.Bangladesh is quite abundant in labor. Thus, the expectation is that increasing workplace regulations would worsen inequality.
- On Labor Power and Workers' Rights
- Regulation Is More Complicated Than You Think
- WTO Head Update
- Zombie Idea: Creditanstalt Did Not Cause the Depre...
- Poor Timing: Military Spending and the Business Cy...
- Understanding the Bangladesh Tragedy with Politica...
- Don't Abandon Materialist Conceptions of Politics ...
- People Should Care About This
- Some trade-related news
- The ECB Is Not a Central Bank
- Keynesian "Depression Economics" Does Not Apply to...
- ▼ April (11)
- ► 2012 (129)
- ► 2011 (365)
- ► 2010 (478)
- ► 2009 (521)
- ► 2008 (134)
- ► 2007 (142)
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Posted by Kindred Winecoff at 5:16 PM . Tuesday, April 30, 2013