Left vertical axis: total U.S. exports, seasonally adjusted, in millions USD (source: BEA)
Right vertical axis: value of U.S. dollar vs. a basket of major foreign currencies (source: St. Louis Fed)
Something about Dr. Oatley's analysis below didn't seem right to me. Have a look at the graph above. Obviously, one graph doesn't prove or disprove anything, but a first glance at recent history seems to indicate that U.S. exports and the value of the dollar are negatively correlated. In other words, as the value of the dollar declines, exports rise. Or, in the language of the post below this one, it seems that the demand for U.S. good is sufficiently responsive to price changes -- i.e. demand is sufficiently elastic -- to produce an increase in exports as the value of the dollar decreases.
Now whether a dollar devaluation would lead to a net benefit to the U.S. is an open question, because (as Dr. Oatley pointed out) a weakening dollar also means a decline in relative national income. But with the economy in less than full employment, it seems that a moderate weakening of the dollar could generate some welfare gains by spurring the utilization of presently dormant resources.
Like I said, one graph doesn't prove or disprove anything. But this is one piece of evidence showing that demand for U.S. goods is not strongly inelastic. And if that's the case, then U.S. policymakers are acting rationally to seek a moderate devaluation of the dollar in order to boost employment. Unfortunately, if it's rational for the U.S., it's also rational for other governments, and a series of competitive devaluations will lead to even greater economic ruin.
(This says nothing about the capital inflows -- made necessary by running a current account deficit -- which helped fuel the dot com and subprime bubbles. Perhaps more on that later.)
- ► 2013 (95)
- ► 2012 (129)
- ► 2011 (365)
- ► 2010 (478)
- What A Difference a Decade Makes
- Payback Time
- The Real Exchange Rate and the Current Account, 19...
- A Thousand Words
- Canard Pekinois
- Blogging Gets More Cachet
- Financial Crisis' First Casualty?
- Why Adjust?
- What Happens in Davos...
- A Person Needs a Face; A Tree Needs Bark
- Are Economists Completely Clueless?
- Discounting Obama's 'Aggressive Attitude' Toward C...
- Best Wishes, President Obama, But Low Expectations...
- More Sweatshop Blogging
- Deflation Watch
- Revenue Sharing in Iraq: When IPE Meets Security S...
- Sweatshops and Trade Agreements
- When Marx Isn't Really Marx
- Has the Financial Bailout Worked?
- Zimbabwe introduces new $50 billion note
- Foggy Thoughts on Decoupling
- Piracy Update!
- Buying Hearts and Minds
- Breaking: Entire U.S. Economy Ceases to Exist
- BOE sets a record!
- American debt don't taste too good anymore
- On the (De)Merits of Liberal Illiberalism
- Should We Hope For More Protectionism?
- The New Economic Order: Same As the Old Economic O...
- ▼ January (31)
- ► 2008 (134)
- ► 2007 (142)
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Posted by Kindred Winecoff at 10:26 PM . Tuesday, January 27, 2009