Okay, so my last post on Grim's piece on the Fed was a tad, er, shrill. I thought (and still think) that in advancing his central argument -- that the Fed stifles discussion, debate, and dissent -- Grim did not do due diligence. For example, his piece never mentions any member of the Board of Governors or the fact that dissents at BoG meetings have been common during Bernanke's term. In fact, last year many were complaining that the Fed was too divided to send clear policy signals, and this was hampering the effectiveness of the organization.
Nor does Grim mention the ideological battles between Janet Yellen (President of the San Francisco Fed and possible future Chairperson) and William Poole (former President of the St. Louis Fed), which are well-known to any casual observer of the Fed in the 2000s. Yellen is an inflation dove, while Poole is a hawk, and their debates took place at the highest fora in the Fed and had a direct influence on policy-making. Many other debates took place under the radar, but had broad influence within and without the Fed.
Moreover, it is silly to argue that the Fed shouldn't seek the opinion of as many economists as is feasible. If the Fed didn't employ so many economists as researchers and consultants it would be much easier to argue that they had ideological blinders on. If the Fed is so blinkered, then why bother hiring so many different researchers? Why use up resources, fund research, and pay salaries of so many economists if you're just going to ignore them all dissent?
That's not to say that there aren't some cheerleaders out there; of course there are. But as Grim so ably showed, the Fed is a very large organization that hires a lot of people. What bureaucratic organization is immune from this accusation?
The Fed is the most scrutinized technocratic organization in the world, and we're going through a financial crisis that has devastated the real economy, so some existential musings are certainly appropriate. But Grim goes way beyond that, stringing together a series of one-sided quotes and weak insinuations. To what end? He wants to show that the Fed's is influence is substantial, monolithic, and pernicious. The first part is not in dispute, the second part is demonstrably false, and the third part -- if it can be shown at all -- requires an argument that would be well over Grim's head.
It is a very bad article.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Academia Adjustment Afghanistan Africa AIG America Argentina Austerity Bailout Banking Bargaining Basel Bernanke Bias Blogging Business cycle; recession; financial crisis Cap and Trade capital controls capital flows central banks; moral hazard Chavez China China Trade Climate Change Contentious Politics Cuba Currencies Currency Crises; financial crisis Current Account Data Debt Debt; China; United States; Decession Politics Decoupling Deflation democracy Democrats; Trade policy development Diplomacy Dollar; China; Currency Manipulation; Exchange Rates dollar; exchange rate policy ECB ECB; Fed; Monetary Policy Economic Growth Economics Egypt election EMU; monetary union Environment EU; Agriculture; Common Agricultural Policy Euro Europe; labor; immigration European Union Exchange Rates Farm Bill; Agriculture FDI Fed; Monetary Policy finance financial crisis financial crisis; subprime Fiscal Policy; monetary policy; elections Fiscal Stimulus Foreign Aid Foreign Policy France Free Trade Agreements G-20 G20 Summit Game Theory Germany global recession globalization Grand Theory Great Britain Greece health care reform Hegemony Human Rights Iceland imbalance IMF immigration Incentives income distribution income inequality; globalization India Inequality inflation institutions Interests international finance International Law International Monetary System International Relations Investment IPE Iran Iraq Ireland ISA Italy Japan labor markets Latin America Libya Macroeconomics Marxism Mexico Microfinance Miscellany monetary policy Monetary policy; Federal Reserve moral hazard Narcissism Networks Nobelist Smackdown North Korea Obama Oil PIGS Pirates Political Economy Political Methodology Political Science Political Survival Political Theory Power Protectionism Protests Public Choice Public opinion Rational Choice regulation Research Review Russia Sanctions Security Dilemma security threats Soccer Social Science Sovereign Debt Spain Sports Statistics stock markets Systems Tariffs TARP Taxes TBTF Technocracy technology terrorism Trade trade policy UNC Unemployment United States US-South Korea Venezuela WTO WTO; Doha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(521)
-
▼
September
(58)
- Gender Dynamics of Modern Day Chess
- Liberté, égalité, fraternité
- First Day of Class in Tehran
- Protocols of the Elders of Xi'an
- BdM Talks Iran on the Daily Show
- Stand-up Economist
- Paging Dan Drezner
- Should Zelaya Have Returned to Honduras?
- On Keynes, Lucas, and Rationality
- Rogoff on International Financial Regulation
- Weekend Links
- Incentives Matter
- Two Nations Divided by An (Un)Common Arithmetic
- NYC Goes Green
- More on the Price Elasticities of Morals
- Blog Post of the Week
- Mmm... Chicken
- Did CAFTA Cause the Honduran Coup?
- A Tobin Tax Isn't the Answer
- Concert in Havana
- The Technological Trouble of Climate Change
- Weekend Links
- Quote of the Day
- When Gordon Brown Saved the World
- Is Obama Mimicking George W. Bush on Trade?
- Playing a Fool's Game
- Spoke Too Soon
- Transforming Preferences
- Krugman vs. Cochrane
- Cochrane: Against Krugman's View of Macroeconomics
- Why We Shouldn't Try to Inflate Our Way out of Debt
- Finding Shoes Just Got Easier
- More on the Grim View of the Fed
- Yeah, But Can He Name All the Capitals?
- Worst Attempt at Character Assassination... Ever
- Panic!
- Link Dump: "Everywhere I Look I See Idiots" edition
- More on Japan's Health Care System
- I Fear for the Finance Students at Washburn Univer...
- Geithner's Plan for Financial Regulation
- On Krugman on Macroeconomics
- Am I Dreaming?
- Sentence of the Day
- Dodging the "G" Word
- The Softer Side of Henry Kissinger
- The Amorality of Public Goods
- Another European Cartoon Scandal
- Newsflash: Obama Continues to Punt on Trade
- The U.S. Navy Is on a Boat
- Why Oh Why Can't We Have a Better Blogosphere?
- Mash-Ups, Music, Borrowing and the Law
- The Income Elasticity of Demand for Public Morals
- Brad DeLong Wrote Something Important in 2005
- What the Recent Japan Election Means
- Can Obama Save the Empire?
- Foreign Policy Poetry
- The Bailout:
- W.T.O. Sanctions U.S.
-
▼
September
(58)
Saturday, September 12, 2009
More on the Grim View of the Fed
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment