Yeah, nothing new. There seems to have been a recent uptick in people getting angry about it. This rant in particular was pretty satisfying. And while there are some positive trends towards increasing access to research -- e.g. JSTOR is moving towards open access -- in general the barriers to dissemination of research are silly.
Because I have access to university facilities, usually I find things like journal access to be more of an annoyance than anything. I have to log onto the university's library's web page, navigate through five or six screens, enter passwords a few times, and then I get the article. That's annoying, but at the end of the day I get access to almost everything for free.
Almost everything. I currently want to read an article in the newest issue of Political Science Quarterly, but my university's library only has online access for PSQ issues that are at least six months old. So I can't read this article. And I can't find an ungated version anywhere else. I guess I could go to the physical library and try to navigate the hundreds of journals on the racks, but by the time I find it (assuming I do), check it out, and get back to my office I will have spent half an hour or more of my time, which is probably about as long as it would take me to read the article. Plus I won't be able to keep an electronic copy to reference in the future unless I scan it.
In this case making their material difficult to read is bad for the author and publisher as well, because I likely would have blogged the article. That's (a very small amount of) free publicity, now lost. I might have assigned it to my class, as I'm looking for one more current reading to add to the syllabus on this topic. But not if my students can't find it. And -- not that they really care -- I can't imagine ever submitting any of my own work to a journal where I know that no one will be able to read it until it's lost currency.
Perhaps the intention of the policy is to motivate me to pay for a subscription to PSQ. Instead it's motivated me to ignore it entirely. It's not like I don't have other things to read.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(19)
-
▼
January
(13)
- Definitely Not Expansionary, Maybe Not Even Auster...
- Global Financial Markets FOTD
- A Debate I'd Like to See
- There Is No Great Stagnation, Only Great Integrati...
- It's A System, Not a Dyad
- SOTU Bingo
- Paradigms in Political Science
- Interests, Ideas, and MIT Economists
- (Terrible, No Good) GOTD
- Why Theories of Regulation Are Inadequate
- Economists Are Not Doctors
- Academic Publishers Are Evil
- Baking Banking Instability into the European Cake
-
▼
January
(13)
-
►
2011
(365)
-
►
December
(15)
- We Won An Award!
- There Is No Such Thing As a Free Market
- Who Wants to Be a President?
- Political Survival in Syria
- The IMF Isn't Technocratic Either
- Hitchens and Iraq
- (Do Not) RIP, Kim Jong Il
- RIP, Vaclav Havel
- RIP, Christopher Hitchens
- There Is No Technocracy QOTD
- Insta-Classic
- Arbitrage Opportunity of the Day
- (There Can Be No) Flight to Safety Uh-Oh GOTD
- sdjfhklsdfjhslkhdks
- The Arab Spring and the Global Economy, or, The Ge...
-
►
November
(27)
- Political Economy in Fiction QOTD
- Kindleberger Smiles
- More US Debt Needed?
- Is Job Creation Really Impossible?
- I Would Not Have Guessed This China-US FOTD
- Short Note on the Importance of History and Govern...
- Why Is the US Doing So Well?
- The World is Hierarchical
- Weekend Links
- Review: Exorbitant Privilege
- On Crises
- New Research
- Is This Really True? QOTD
- The GSG Redux
- Global Political Economy QOTD
- Eurozone Crisis FOTD
-
►
December
(15)
Monday, January 16, 2012
Academic Publishers Are Evil
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
From experience, I can tell you that it is important for departments to make clear to the library what they want. Perhaps PSQ is part of a bundle of electronic journals that are too expensive, but an email to the library (even from a grad student, though of course a faculty member carries more weight) could have an effect.
Not clear from what you say that PSQ is the party to blame here. Maybe -- I have no idea -- it costs roughly the same to get a current online institutional sub to PSQ as to, say, IO, and the library decided for whatever reason to take IO but not PSQ. As I say, I have no idea, but I wouldn't necessarily jump to conclusions...
P.s. that is a good rant that you link to.
Greg,
Thing is, I generally don't care about PSQ all that much. I don't read it frequently enough to care about the 6 month wait. Except when I want to read a current article for the purpose of seeing if it's suitable for a class.
LFC,
I get that, but it's not a good state of affairs when a flagship state university should have to choose between major journals in a non-obscure academic field.
Post a Comment