IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(21)
-
►
February
(8)
- There Is No Technocracy, Bank of Japan Edition
- Conflict Scholars Should Learn Political Economy I...
- What Argentina Says About Greece
- Brinksmanship in Political Economy
- Climate Change, Development, and Conflict
- Winning the Future
- The World Is Still Not a Dyad
- Slower Chinese Growth Could Be Good for the Global...
-
▼
January
(13)
- Definitely Not Expansionary, Maybe Not Even Auster...
- Global Financial Markets FOTD
- A Debate I'd Like to See
- There Is No Great Stagnation, Only Great Integrati...
- It's A System, Not a Dyad
- SOTU Bingo
- Paradigms in Political Science
- Interests, Ideas, and MIT Economists
- (Terrible, No Good) GOTD
- Why Theories of Regulation Are Inadequate
- Economists Are Not Doctors
- Academic Publishers Are Evil
- Baking Banking Instability into the European Cake
-
►
February
(8)
-
►
2011
(365)
-
►
December
(15)
- We Won An Award!
- There Is No Such Thing As a Free Market
- Who Wants to Be a President?
- Political Survival in Syria
- The IMF Isn't Technocratic Either
- Hitchens and Iraq
- (Do Not) RIP, Kim Jong Il
- RIP, Vaclav Havel
- RIP, Christopher Hitchens
- There Is No Technocracy QOTD
- Insta-Classic
- Arbitrage Opportunity of the Day
- (There Can Be No) Flight to Safety Uh-Oh GOTD
- sdjfhklsdfjhslkhdks
- The Arab Spring and the Global Economy, or, The Ge...
-
►
November
(27)
- Political Economy in Fiction QOTD
- Kindleberger Smiles
- More US Debt Needed?
- Is Job Creation Really Impossible?
- I Would Not Have Guessed This China-US FOTD
- Short Note on the Importance of History and Govern...
- Why Is the US Doing So Well?
- The World is Hierarchical
- Weekend Links
- Review: Exorbitant Privilege
- On Crises
- New Research
- Is This Really True? QOTD
- The GSG Redux
-
►
December
(15)
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Paradigms in Political Science
It may not be easy to see (click here for a bigger image, and here for some discussion at TMC), but the above graph shows the probability that a political scientist will think that the eurozone will split up versus stay together. The group in the top left are IPE scholars, the middle are International Org scholars, and the bottom are comparativists who study Europe. I'm not a big fan of this graphing style, as it seems to obscure nearly as much information as it illuminates, but it's fairly easy to see that IPE folks are the most convinced that at least one country will leave the euro. More than half of us. Meanwhile, only about 37% of IO folks and 30% of Europeanists think a country will exit the common currency.
I find this interesting for a lot of reasons, but mostly because I think provides a pretty stark reminder that political scientists think very differently about politics. This could break down along paradigmatic lines -- the authors of the report note that constructivists tend to be comparativists, while realists tend to be in IR. I still think that a materialist conception of politics carries me farthest down the road I wish to be on, so I think it is fairly likely that a country will drop the euro if things continue to deteriorate.
I've had many conversations with Europeanists on this point. All of them are enamored of the EU. For them the collapse of the EU is unthinkable. I can't understand why. It's not as if fixed exchange rate regimes -- and political unions -- haven't collapsed before, particularly when subjected to this level of stress. That said, they certainly know more about Europe and the European identity than I do, and they take it very seriously.
I don't really have an answer here. I hope that conditions in the EU improve enough that we don't have to test these paradigms this time. A confederal Europe is good for the world, on net, particularly if they can figure out how to manage the broader economy in ways that don't lead to periodic crises. But I have my doubts about that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


0 comments:
Post a Comment