The most obvious answer would seemingly be "no". After all, equity markets have not recovered their lost value, and the recession is still spreading throughout the real economy. The Obama administration is planning a $700bn stimulus package to create jobs, and monetary policy has fired just about all its bullets without making too much of a dent.
But a deeper look gives some reasons for optimism. First, the banking industry appears to have been stabilized. There is still some restructuring going on, of course, and that will no doubt continue for quite some time. But the TED spread (a measure of how risky inter-bank lending is perceived to be) is back to relatively low levels, and there are other signs that credit markets have begun to thaw, and we may have escaped a liquidity trap. In short, the TARP program has improved conditions in the banking sector, if only by preventing further collapse.
Of course it is still too soon to tell how everything will play out, but in just two or three months ago we were concerned about the collapse of the entire global financial system, and doomsday scenarios were not considered impossible or even especially unlikely. As we sit now, we are more concerned with getting the real economy moving again, the coming structural adjustment, and trade policy. I do not mean to diminish these other issues, but they are more indicative of a typical -- if deep -- recession than of a Global Financial Armageddon. And keep in mind that TARP has only used about half of the $700bn, which now looks as if it will be repaid to the U.S. Treasury with interest, so there is still some flexibility for the Fed and Treasury as we move forward.
And, as a recent WaPo editorial reminds us, this has benefits for everybody living inside this country, plus many more living outside of it. It's too early to do a celebratory lap, but so far TARP seems to be working.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(521)
-
▼
January
(31)
- What A Difference a Decade Makes
- Payback Time
- Meta
- The Real Exchange Rate and the Current Account, 19...
- A Thousand Words
- Canard Pekinois
- Blogging Gets More Cachet
- Financial Crisis' First Casualty?
- Why Adjust?
- What Happens in Davos...
- A Person Needs a Face; A Tree Needs Bark
- Are Economists Completely Clueless?
- Manipulation
- Discounting Obama's 'Aggressive Attitude' Toward C...
- Best Wishes, President Obama, But Low Expectations
- More Sweatshop Blogging
- Deflation Watch
- Revenue Sharing in Iraq: When IPE Meets Security S...
- Sweatshops and Trade Agreements
- When Marx Isn't Really Marx
- Has the Financial Bailout Worked?
- Zimbabwe introduces new $50 billion note
- Foggy Thoughts on Decoupling
- Piracy Update!
- Buying Hearts and Minds
- Breaking: Entire U.S. Economy Ceases to Exist
- BOE sets a record!
- American debt don't taste too good anymore
- On the (De)Merits of Liberal Illiberalism
- Should We Hope For More Protectionism?
- The New Economic Order: Same As the Old Economic O...
-
▼
January
(31)
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Has the Financial Bailout Worked?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment