Our friend Emmanuel from IPE Zone comments on my post about hegemonic stability: "In any event, I agree that the US cannot fulfill this role like it did in the past."
This is a fine conclusion, but I wonder if Emmanuel might sketch out the analysis that supports it. Don't worry, Emmanuel, I promise not to assign a grade to it.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Academia Adjustment Afghanistan Africa AIG America Argentina Austerity Bailout Banking Bargaining Basel Bernanke Bias Blogging Business cycle; recession; financial crisis Cap and Trade capital controls capital flows central banks; moral hazard Chavez China China Trade Climate Change Contentious Politics Cuba Currencies Currency Crises; financial crisis Current Account Data Debt Debt; China; United States; Decession Politics Decoupling Deflation democracy Democrats; Trade policy development Diplomacy Dollar; China; Currency Manipulation; Exchange Rates dollar; exchange rate policy ECB ECB; Fed; Monetary Policy Economic Growth Economics Egypt election EMU; monetary union Environment EU; Agriculture; Common Agricultural Policy Euro Europe; labor; immigration European Union Exchange Rates Farm Bill; Agriculture FDI Fed; Monetary Policy finance financial crisis financial crisis; subprime Fiscal Policy; monetary policy; elections Fiscal Stimulus Foreign Aid Foreign Policy France Free Trade Agreements G-20 G20 Summit Game Theory Germany global recession globalization Grand Theory Great Britain Greece health care reform Hegemony Human Rights Iceland imbalance IMF immigration Incentives income distribution income inequality; globalization India Inequality inflation institutions Interests international finance International Law International Monetary System International Relations Investment IPE Iran Iraq Ireland ISA Italy Japan labor markets Latin America Libya Macroeconomics Marxism Mexico Microfinance Miscellany monetary policy Monetary policy; Federal Reserve moral hazard Narcissism Networks Nobelist Smackdown North Korea Obama Oil PIGS Pirates Political Economy Political Methodology Political Science Political Survival Political Theory Power Protectionism Protests Public Choice Public opinion Rational Choice regulation Research Review Russia Sanctions Security Dilemma security threats Soccer Social Science Sovereign Debt Spain Sports Statistics stock markets Systems Tariffs TARP Taxes TBTF Technocracy technology terrorism Trade trade policy UNC Unemployment United States US-South Korea Venezuela WTO WTO; Doha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(521)
-
▼
March
(25)
- Should Europe Do More?
- Assorted Depressing Links
- G-20
- Ode to Paul
- Pick Your Poison
- World's Biggest Banks
- Yes, But He Has Good Intentions
- More on Punitive Taxation
- The Market Norm of Non-Cooperation
- Pop Quiz
- Cheetahs vs. Hippos: Against "Swiss Bank Socialism"
- The Lone Ranger
- What, Me Worry?
- Can the US Perform Hegemonic Functions?
- Who Fails the Hegemony Test?
- Hegemoaning
- Quants and the Limits of Certainty
- Links for the Weekend
- Broader Unemployment Figure
- Small Change in Cuban Cabinet...
- When Expectations Converge
- Through the Looking Glass...
- The Dynamic Duo
- Gettin' Ugly in Ukraine...
- The Next Iceland?
-
▼
March
(25)
Friday, March 13, 2009
Can the US Perform Hegemonic Functions?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Yikes! That's a tall order, but I will oblige for now with this working paper. I originally thought it would make for an interesting journal submission circa 2006, but its ideas have since become "accepted wisdom".
Given the time frame I worked on it, some ideas are dated so don't fault me on those. The basic points are still sound, though. Most importantly, the US has little political will to confront its onerous future obligations, preferring to take a punt on difficult choices.
At the present time, this would include Obama's lip service but failure to enact PAYGO legislation.
Post a Comment