Martin Feldstein has a plan for reducing the U.S.'s sovereign debt, in the form of an NBER working paper. I tend to be a believer in Herb Stein's Law on such matters.
That is all.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(478)
-
▼
October
(41)
- Tyler Cowen on Immigration
- Why Greece Won't Default (Yet)
- Mea Culpa (Kinda Sorta)
- Much Ado About China
- Structure and Experimentation in the International...
- Nye Does TED
- The Global Financial System as a Network
- Fiscal Stimulus and The Unholy Trilemma
- The EU as a Deficit Economy
- Balancing Act
- Global Imbalances
- TARP Still Making Money
- Aid Incentives Matter (?)
- Aniversario Feliz
- We're About to Get a Huge Natural Experiment of Au...
- China's Tantrum
- Hegemony and Currency Wars
- If the Debt Cannot Be Sustained, It Won't Be
- QOTD
- Rosling Talks to TED (Again)
- Trivia Time (E.U. Currency Arbitrage Edition)
- Pounding Away at the Deregulation Zombie
- Policy Preferences over Capital Controls
- Just How Laissez-Faire Was the Financial Sector?
- Good Research = ...
- The Merits and Demerits of Relative Decline
- William Easterly Is Shrill!
- Perspective Matters
- Lou Dobbs: Hypocrite
- QOTD
- Auschwitz, Germany, and 1968
- Hatchet Job
- OT: European Stuff
- Defining Basel Down
- A Prediction Sure to Be Wrong
- Revisionist History
- Switzerland Says Basel Isn't Enough
- The New Germany, 20 Years On
- The EU (Finally!) Cedes Some IMF Seats to the BRICs
- Politics Everywhere or Markets in Everything? Fake...
- This Week in "The World Is Messy"
-
▼
October
(41)
Monday, October 18, 2010
If the Debt Cannot Be Sustained, It Won't Be
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
What, deficits matter now? You mean those poor UNC folks were laid off due to belt tightening in America where it's our currency, your problem?
Whatever happened to the guy who used to write about "intertemporal carry trade" and "[t]hat doesn't mean I support austerity for the U.S. While interest rates remain low we are not in a precarious position, so retrenchment would be foolish."
Welcome to gnarly American reality, son ;-) I guess ol' Erskine Bowles--I think he's got something to do with UNC--at least made some sense.
What are you talking about? I'm pretty blase about the debt... as this post was intended to signify. Feldstein doesn't believe that we should lower deficits now, and neither do I. Why should we, when interest rates are still at near-historic lows? The intertemporal carry trade is still good for the US.
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^TNX+Interactive#chart2:symbol=^tnx;range=my;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined
Investors are clearly not as bearish on the US as you are. The US gov't can borrow for 30 years at less than 4% interest. That's... incredible.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=^TYX&t=my&l=on&z=l&q=l&c=
OK, no worries. I guess Japan should borrow even more than the US since it can borrow for even cheaper. No ill effects from taking on too much debt there.
Like in the UNC system, there's no cause for budgetary concern. Silly me.
Post a Comment