I'm still in Montreal, and behind the curve, but I don't want this place to be completely dormant so I'm going to pick on Emmanuel once again. Here he says "the US trade representative is tasked with promoting trade liberalization first and foremost". That is not true, and a political economist should know better. The US trade rep is first and foremost tasked with promoting American business interests. There is no ex ante reason to believe that always or even usually involves liberalization. In this case, it means "we're not liberalizing any more until China agrees to play by the same rules as everyone else". Remember that when China joined the WTO in 2001 it was given all sorts of exceptions that allowed it to get access to developed markets for its exports, without having to allow equal access to its markets in exchange. Given large U.S. trade deficits and high unemployment, the USTR is saying "no mas": either there's some reciprocity, or no new deal.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(365)
-
▼
March
(27)
- Winter's Officially Over
- Will Barclays Leave London?
- Insane Price Point of the Day
- Some Politics of Debt, Default, and the EMU
- Krugman vs. Krugman
- More on Libya and the U.S.
- FYI
- The Post-American World? Not Yet.
- "Social science and the Libyan adventure", Rebutted
- Real-Life Laffer Curve (or, Arbitraging Internatio...
- George Rabinowitz
- International Relations, 1980-2006
- RIP, George Rabinowitz
- Quick Note on Trade
- This Is What Adjustment Looks Like (An Ongoing Ser...
- ISA
- On the Dollar, Euro, and RMB
- Hegemoaning
- Cake! And Eat it Too!
- Deep Thoughts
- #Winning the Future
- Who's Winning the Future? Someone's Gotta Keep Score
- Dude, Where's My Government?
- Just Sayin'
- UNC Everywhere
- Digging the Hole Deeper
- Missing the Point
-
▼
March
(27)
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
US business interests--OK. But China receiving a lot of concessions is not quite correct. Who was it who insisted on classifying China as a non-market economy for 15 years--something that makes it vulnerable to dumping claims?
Trade followers should know the answer to that. I deal in specifics.
I didn't say concessions. I said "exceptions". China was given 5 years to transition towards full WTO-compliance, and was given many exceptions until then. In that 5 years it's done very well with tariff reductions, but much worse with IP, subsidies, financial services, export restrictions, etc. The USTR is saying that the US won't consider further liberalization until China comes into compliance with its current commitments.
This isn't exactly a secret. The USTR's position on this is easily found on its web site. Reports and fact sheets available there.
http://www.ustr.gov/countries-regions/china
Post a Comment