Congressional Democrats are pushing to link trade agreements to labor and environmental standards. Efforts to do so during the 1990s ran into opposition from developing countries (remember the "Battle in Seattle?"). New public opinion data from the World Public Opinion.org suggests that this may no longer be the case. "Strong majorities in developing nations around the world support requiring countries that sign trade agreements to meet minimum labor and environmental standards."
One can't help but be struck, however, by the negative correlation between per capita income and support for such linkage.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(142)
-
▼
March
(18)
- Protectionism by Other Means
- Blinder , Trade and Jobs, Again
- Passive Voice
- Outsourcing the Service Sector?
- U.S.-China Trade
- Linking Trade and Labor Standards
- Home Ownership and Labor Mobility
- John Edwards on Global Poverty
- Track MDG Progress
- Rising Land Prices in Iowa
- Trade Politics by Any Other Name Would Still Smell...
- Giving Fish to the World's Poorest (but not too many)
- The Domestic Politics of "Food For Peace"
- Linking Trade and Labor Standards (Again)
- Sherrod Brown on American Trade Policy
- Trade and Wage Insurance
- Still Negotiating...
- Eroding American Economic Sovereignty
-
▼
March
(18)
Monday, March 26, 2007
Linking Trade and Labor Standards
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment