While we are talking about programs that only pretend to be first and foremost about helping the world's poor (see previous post), I noticed this today.
"It seems that the "Red" campaign, launched by Bono to purge Africa of disease ...has, after all, been more about promoting Bono and his famous mates than raising cash for Africa. Advertising Age calculates that around $100 million has been spent blanketing billboards and magazines with images of Bono and other "celebrities", while the total sum raised for Africa is $18 million." (From "Hating Bono Again"). This makes me think about William Easterly; not sure why.
The Advertising Age article from which this fact comes had a nice quote from one of the Red campaign critics that is almost as depressing. "The Red campaign proposes consumption as the cure to the world's evils," said Ben Davis, creative director at Word Pictures Ideas..."Can't we just focus on the real solution -- giving money?"
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(142)
-
▼
March
(18)
- Protectionism by Other Means
- Blinder , Trade and Jobs, Again
- Passive Voice
- Outsourcing the Service Sector?
- U.S.-China Trade
- Linking Trade and Labor Standards
- Home Ownership and Labor Mobility
- John Edwards on Global Poverty
- Track MDG Progress
- Rising Land Prices in Iowa
- Trade Politics by Any Other Name Would Still Smell...
- Giving Fish to the World's Poorest (but not too many)
- The Domestic Politics of "Food For Peace"
- Linking Trade and Labor Standards (Again)
- Sherrod Brown on American Trade Policy
- Trade and Wage Insurance
- Still Negotiating...
- Eroding American Economic Sovereignty
-
▼
March
(18)
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Giving Fish to the World's Poorest (but not too many)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment