The World Economic Outlook (an IMF publication) dedicates a full chapter to exploring globalization's impact on income inequality. "Over the past two decades, income growth has been positive for all quintiles in virtually all regions and all income groups during the recent period of globalization. At the same time, however, income inequality has increased mainly in middle- and high-income countries, and less so in low-income countries."
The study highlights the distinct causal forces exerted by trade and foreign direct investment. Trade and trade liberalization reduce inequality; foreign direct investment increases inequality.
The bottom line, however, is that technological change rather than globalization per se is the main cause of rising income inequality.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Academia Adjustment Afghanistan Africa AIG America Argentina Austerity Bailout Banking Bargaining Basel Bernanke Bias Blogging Business cycle; recession; financial crisis Cap and Trade capital controls capital flows central banks; moral hazard Chavez China China Trade Climate Change Contentious Politics Cuba Currencies Currency Crises; financial crisis Current Account Data Debt Debt; China; United States; Decession Politics Decoupling Deflation democracy Democrats; Trade policy development Diplomacy Dollar; China; Currency Manipulation; Exchange Rates dollar; exchange rate policy ECB ECB; Fed; Monetary Policy Economic Growth Economics Egypt election EMU; monetary union Environment EU; Agriculture; Common Agricultural Policy Euro Europe; labor; immigration European Union Exchange Rates Farm Bill; Agriculture FDI Fed; Monetary Policy finance financial crisis financial crisis; subprime Fiscal Policy; monetary policy; elections Fiscal Stimulus Foreign Aid Foreign Policy France Free Trade Agreements G-20 G20 Summit Game Theory Germany global recession globalization Grand Theory Great Britain Greece health care reform Hegemony Human Rights Iceland imbalance IMF immigration Incentives income distribution income inequality; globalization India Inequality inflation institutions Interests international finance International Law International Monetary System International Relations Investment IPE Iran Iraq Ireland ISA Italy Japan labor markets Latin America Libya Macroeconomics Marxism Mexico Microfinance Miscellany monetary policy Monetary policy; Federal Reserve moral hazard Narcissism Networks Nobelist Smackdown North Korea Obama Oil PIGS Pirates Political Economy Political Methodology Political Science Political Survival Political Theory Power Protectionism Protests Public Choice Public opinion Rational Choice regulation Research Review Russia Sanctions Security Dilemma security threats Soccer Social Science Sovereign Debt Spain Sports Statistics stock markets Systems Tariffs TARP Taxes TBTF Technocracy technology terrorism Trade trade policy UNC Unemployment United States US-South Korea Venezuela WTO WTO; Doha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(142)
-
▼
November
(21)
- Real Estate Bubbles, Moral Hazard, and Financial S...
- Petrodollars '00 Style
- Happy Thanksgiving
- Le Compression Grand
- G20 and Global Imbalances
- Craziest Sentence I Read Today
- The Best Sentence I've Read Today
- China's Current Account Surplus and the Yuan
- The Distributive Consequences of International Trade
- The Soaring Euro: Imitation is the Sincerest Form ...
- Krugman on the Dollar and Current Account Adjustment
- Dollars per Second for High-Earning Americans
- Time Erodes all Meaning, or the Irony of TV
- Congress Votes on the Peru FTA
- The Dollar and the Housing Market, Again
- Weak Dollars, Subprime Messes, and Monetary Policy...
- Subsidizing the Royal Farm
- Government Debt Clock
- Who Exactly are the Vultures?
- Globalization and Inequality
- The Natural Resource Curse
-
▼
November
(21)
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Globalization and Inequality
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Wouldn't income inequality have risen less without globalization and keeping technological advances constant? Asked another way, doesn't globalization perpetuate income inequality through erasing certain jobs that would stay in developed countries otherwise (telephone services, basic manufacturing)?
Yes, this is precisely what the IMF study finds--foreign direct investment increased income inequality by reducing the demand for (and thus wage of) relatively low-skill workers in the US and EU and increasing the demand for relatively higher-skilled workers in developing countries.
But, the impact of FDI on income inequality is much smaller than the impact of tech change.
Post a Comment