When I went to bed last night the news sites were all saying that a resumption of the conflict on the Korean peninsula was possible -- even "imminent" according to one source -- if the South proceeded with its plans to hold a military exercise in disputed territory. I went to bed thinking that I'd wake up to no news, which would certainly be good news. That turns out to have been right, so here's some thoughts on the situation.
1. The security dilemma is still the most important concept in international relations. Obviously the South is spooked by the North's nukes and occasional belligerence, and felt the need to demonstrate its defensive capabilities. The North is obviously spooked by the fact that a huge, well-funded military backed by (still) the only global superpower is right below it, and it can't necessarily count on its only ally (China) for much support.
2. Schelling is still boss. He first identified the "cliff-dancing" strategy in his 1960 book, and it is still relevant. The South just danced a bit closer to the brink, and it worked.
3. North Korea is very weak, but it is not crazy. Neither impression is the one Kim Jong Il wishes to leave, but that conclusion is inescapable at this point. The North threatened retaliation if the South conducted this exercise, but immediately back-tracked since those threats were clearly not credible. In fact, it appears that once its bluff was called it was willing to do quite a lot to walk back its earlier threats. It offered possibly-meaningful concessions in negotiations with Bill Richardson, including resumption of the six party talks, access to its nuclear facilities by outside inspectors, and the return of the remains of U.S. soldiers that died during the Korean War. I'm not at all suggesting that the South should continue to posture in this way, but in this case it appears to have worked.
4. Nukes only get you so much deterrence capability. Namely, they can (perhaps) act as a repellent, but cannot compel others to
5. For all of the talk about shifting power structures in Asia, the U.S. and its ally still won the day. Not just by holding the exercise without retaliation, which was sort of a "remind them who's boss" maneuver, but also by the response of the other regional powers. China and Russia implored the South to stand down, to no avail, indicating a clear lack of power and influence in the region. This follows the U.S.'s decision to conduct joint exercises with South Korea last month, a move China opposed because it occurred in China's "exclusive economic zone" but did nothing to prevent.
6. This incident is really the first time the Obama administration has been willing to stare down some of the U.S.'s antagonists, and he won: the other side blinked (DPRK) or sat down (China). Not only the military exercises, which not only involved moving the USS George Washington strike group to the Yellow Sea, but also passed the ROK-US trade agreement. I'm not sure whether this will encourage more risk-taking by the administration or even whether it should, but it is notable.
7. Keep all of this in mind when you hear that Iran is crazy, undeterrable, will be able to marshall nuclear capabilities to blackmail the Middle East, etc. All of those ideas have been tested over the past month in Korea, and all of them have been found wanting.
UPDATE: Drezner also posted thoughts. I like his #4, but I don't buy it. I think #3 is more likely, and if true is a positive sign for the future of Asia.
IPE @ UNC
IPE@UNC is a group blog maintained by faculty and graduate students in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The opinions expressed on these pages are our own, and have nothing to do with UNC.
Bookshelf
Tags
Academia Adjustment Afghanistan Africa AIG America Argentina Austerity Bailout Banking Bargaining Basel Bernanke Bias Blogging Business cycle; recession; financial crisis Cap and Trade capital controls capital flows central banks; moral hazard Chavez China China Trade Climate Change Contentious Politics Cuba Currencies Currency Crises; financial crisis Current Account Data Debt Debt; China; United States; Decession Politics Decoupling Deflation democracy Democrats; Trade policy development Diplomacy Dollar; China; Currency Manipulation; Exchange Rates dollar; exchange rate policy ECB ECB; Fed; Monetary Policy Economic Growth Economics Egypt election EMU; monetary union Environment EU; Agriculture; Common Agricultural Policy Euro Europe; labor; immigration European Union Exchange Rates Farm Bill; Agriculture FDI Fed; Monetary Policy finance financial crisis financial crisis; subprime Fiscal Policy; monetary policy; elections Fiscal Stimulus Foreign Aid Foreign Policy France Free Trade Agreements G-20 G20 Summit Game Theory Germany global recession globalization Grand Theory Great Britain Greece health care reform Hegemony Human Rights Iceland imbalance IMF immigration Incentives income distribution income inequality; globalization India Inequality inflation institutions Interests international finance International Law International Monetary System International Relations Investment IPE Iran Iraq Ireland ISA Italy Japan labor markets Latin America Libya Macroeconomics Marxism Mexico Microfinance Miscellany monetary policy Monetary policy; Federal Reserve moral hazard Narcissism Networks Nobelist Smackdown North Korea Obama Oil PIGS Pirates Political Economy Political Methodology Political Science Political Survival Political Theory Power Protectionism Protests Public Choice Public opinion Rational Choice regulation Research Review Russia Sanctions Security Dilemma security threats Soccer Social Science Sovereign Debt Spain Sports Statistics stock markets Systems Tariffs TARP Taxes TBTF Technocracy technology terrorism Trade trade policy UNC Unemployment United States US-South Korea Venezuela WTO WTO; Doha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(478)
-
▼
December
(59)
- The Politics of Basel III [2/2]
- The Politics of Basel III [1/2]
- 2010 Best of the Blog, XIII
- The Vatican Gets Religion on FinReg
- 2010 Best of the Blog, XII
- 2010 Best of the Blog, XI
- Germany's Rising Tea Party Movement
- IPE Everywhere: The Original Tea Party
- 2010 Best of the Blog, X
- 2010 Best of the Blog, IX
- 2010 Best of the Blog, VIII
- 2010 Best of the Blog, VII
- 2010 Best of the Blog, VII
- 2010 Best of the Blog, VI
- RIP Denis Dutton
- 2010 Best of the Blog, V
- 2010 Best of the Blog, IV
- 2010 Best of the Blog, III
- Bizarre Geopolitical Analogy of the Day
- The Grade Inflation Prisoner's Dilemma
- 2010 Best of the Blog, II
- 2010 Best of the Blog, I
- What I've Been Reading...
- Johann Hari's People of 2010
- The Etymology of 'Tariff' and 'Austerity'
- The High Politics of ROK/DPRK Trade
- Interesting US-China Trade Developments
- IPE Everywhere: Soliciting Capital in Macedonia
- Iceland Is Not A Good Example For Running An Economy
- Postwar Macroeconomics
- On DADT Repeal
- Korea
- FOTD
- Newsflash: IMF Is Nervous of Labor Parties
- Paul Krugman on China
- UN Sanctions Against Iraq Finally Lifted
- Slutting My Way Through Macro Theory
- The "I'd Gladly Pay You Tuesday For a Hamburger To...
- Stats Nerd Post
- The Double-Standard Ethics of RCT
- From Iceland to...
- The Ignored Financial Crisis
- E Pluribus dis-Unum
- Parsing Ireland, Germany, and the Euro
- Shout It From The Rooftops
- The Darkest Age of Macroeconomics
- Interesting New Research
- Oh My
- Clarke and Dawe Explain Europe
- Saturday Morning Videos
- It Makes Sense If You Think About It Properly
- Want to Know Who Got Money from the Fed in 2008?
- Why TARP Was Good, and Why Bailout Guarantees Are ...
- When An E.U. Bailout Is A U.S. Bailout
- IR Cartooned
- Rosling on the Beeb
- Explaining Ireland
- Hegemony and Bank Bailouts
- The Political Economy of Climate Change
-
▼
December
(59)
Monday, December 20, 2010
Korea
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment